RESUMO
Abstract Background: There are currently several electrocardiographic algorithms to locate the accessory pathway (AP) in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Objective: To compare the ability of electrocardiographic algorithms in identifying the location of the AP in patients with WPW pattern referred for ablation. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study with 111 patients with WPW syndrome referred for AP ablation. The electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained prior to the ablation was analyzed by an experienced observer who consecutively applied seven algorithms to identify non-invasively the AP. We then compared the location estimated with this assessment with that obtained in the electrophysiological study and calculated the agreement rates. Results: Among the APs, 59 (53.15%) were distributed around the mitral annulus and the remaining 52 (46.85%) were located around the tricuspid annulus. The overall absolute accuracy of the algorithms evaluated varied between 27% and 47%, increasing to between 40% and 76% when we included adjacent locations. The absolute agreement rate by AP location was 2.00-52.20% for septal APs (n = 51), increasing to 5.90-90.20% when considering adjacent locations; 7.70-69.20% for right APs (n = 13), increasing to 42.90-100% when considering adjacent locations; and 21.70-54.50% for left APs (n = 47), increasing to 50-87% when considering adjacent locations. Conclusion: The agreement rates observed for the analyzed scores indicated a low discriminative ability of the ECG in locating the AP in patients with WPW.
Resumo Fundamento: Existem atualmente vários algoritmos eletrocardiográficos para localizar a via acessória (VA) em pacientes com síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW). Objetivo: Comparar a capacidade discriminativa dos algoritmos eletrocardiográficos na localização da VA no padrão de WPW em pacientes encaminhados para ablação. Métodos: Estudo observacional, transversal e retrospectivo, incluindo 111 pacientes com síndrome de WPW encaminhados para ablação da VA. O eletrocardiograma (ECG) prévio à ablação foi analisado por um observador experiente que aplicou consecutivamente sete algoritmos para identificar a VA de forma não invasiva. A localização estimada com esta avaliação foi comparada à obtida no estudo eletrofisiológico e as taxas de acerto foram calculadas. Resultados: Entre as VAs, 59 (53,15%) estavam distribuídas ao redor do anel mitral e as restantes 52 (46,85%) em torno do anel tricúspide. O acerto global absoluto dos algoritmos em estudo variou entre 27% e 47%, aumentando para 40% a 76% quando incluímos localizações adjacentes. O acerto absoluto em função da localização da VA foi o seguinte: para as VAs septais (n = 51) variou entre 2% e 52,20% (5,90% e 90,20% incluindo localizações adjacentes), para as VAs direitas (n = 13) variou entre 7,70% e 69,20% (42,90% e 100%, incluindo localizações adjacentes), para as VAs esquerdas (n = 47) variou entre 21,70% e 54,50% (50% a 87%, incluindo as localizações adjacentes). Conclusões: Os índices de acerto observados para os escores analisados indicaram uma reduzida capacidade discriminativa do ECG na localização da VA em pacientes com WPW.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Feixe Acessório Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Padrões de Referência , Valores de Referência , Síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ablação por Cateter , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Feixe Acessório Atrioventricular/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are currently several electrocardiographic algorithms to locate the accessory pathway (AP) in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of electrocardiographic algorithms in identifying the location of the AP in patients with WPW pattern referred for ablation. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study with 111 patients with WPW syndrome referred for AP ablation. The electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained prior to the ablation was analyzed by an experienced observer who consecutively applied seven algorithms to identify non-invasively the AP. We then compared the location estimated with this assessment with that obtained in the electrophysiological study and calculated the agreement rates. RESULTS: Among the APs, 59 (53.15%) were distributed around the mitral annulus and the remaining 52 (46.85%) were located around the tricuspid annulus. The overall absolute accuracy of the algorithms evaluated varied between 27% and 47%, increasing to between 40% and 76% when we included adjacent locations. The absolute agreement rate by AP location was 2.00-52.20% for septal APs (n = 51), increasing to 5.90-90.20% when considering adjacent locations; 7.70-69.20% for right APs (n = 13), increasing to 42.90-100% when considering adjacent locations; and 21.70-54.50% for left APs (n = 47), increasing to 50-87% when considering adjacent locations. CONCLUSION: The agreement rates observed for the analyzed scores indicated a low discriminative ability of the ECG in locating the AP in patients with WPW.
